NOTE: This post will be periodically updated whenever another, new powerful person makes another asinine statement that makes our eyes roll out of our heads.
As we ride out yet another nauseating wave of revelations about sexual predators in Hollywood, we're also getting outrage from the very industry that enabled their abuse.
Many of the predictable, strongly-worded, flack-approved condemnations from Hollywood elites about their shock, dismay, and (alleged) ignorance of Harvey Weinstein's behavior sounds well-meaning.
But look more closely—at the subtle hedging in their language, at the protective coats of phrasing. And you'll quickly see how some of these people just don't get it. Or, even worse, are making condemnations that slyly deflect any would-be charges of accountability for why this keeps happening. So many people knew. Can every person who condemned Weinstein openly this week not have known?
Yeah, right.
Well-meaning statements don't mean much, ultimately, when the people making them keep demonstrating complicit behavior—the same kind that got us here. As if that's not bad enough, so many of these people are focusing on their owntraumatic feelings about someone else'shorror. Or they dole out justifications for why they're just so much morewoke to why sexually assaulting women is bad (I have daughters! I love my mom!).
Yeah, the intentions are good and all, but the road to hellishly bad takes is paved with good intentions. And also, let's be real, the need to have a strong personal celebrity brand.
Thus, for all these sleepily "woke" celebrities, a guide: Here's how notto respond to widespread sexual misconduct in your industry.
Tweet may have been deleted
Ben? Good news for you: You don't even have to leave the house in order to condemn this kind of behavior in your industry. Just go to the dinner table and ask your brother, Casey Affleck, about it. Or, better yet, Argolook at yourself in a goddamn mirror (and I'm sorry, but your half-assed Tweet apology sounds about as remorseful as a kid caught with his hand molesting the innards of a cookie jar, mouth full of cookie).
As far as lending your support, two things:
1. Women aren't objects in your White Knight narrative who exist to be saved from rape to further your character development. We just need you to care enough when we're sexually assaulted IRL to actually do something about it.
2. When you lie awake in bed at night just rackingyour brain about "what you can do to make sure this doesn't happen to others," think about notsaying some dismissive bullshit like this to victims like Rose McGowan:
@benaffleck “GODDAMNIT! I TOLD HIM TO STOP DOING THAT” you said that to my face. The press conf I was made to go to after assault. You lie.
— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) October 10, 2017
Because while these victims suffer assaults, then summon the courage to come forward about it, your careless lies lead to countless others being assaulted.
Finally, that brings us to another common through-line of reasoning from the men of Hollywood (including Weinstein himself): A woman shouldn't have to be your sister, friend, coworker, or daughter in order for you to care about her sexual assault. Or anyone else's.
Matt Damon's interview with Deadline Hollywoodhas come under fire for his insistence that he could've stopped all these assaults—if he'd only known about them.
Aside from the cringe-worthy egotism of Jason Bourne'sMatt Damon's mentality, Damon went on to claim that men "have to be vigilant and we have to help protect and call this stuff out because we have our sisters and our daughters and our mothers."
PSA to all men, straight, gay, innocent, or criminal: The reason women shouldn't be raped is notbecause they are your sister or daughter. They shouldn't be raped because they are people. Becoming a father isn't (and shouldn't be) a prerequisite to understanding why sexually harassing or assaulting people is wrong. This should be common logic, but it's not, because people are narcissistic idiots who only see the world through their own myopic vantage point. You are getting the chance, now, not to be. Don't.
Becoming a father is not and should notbe a prerequisite to understanding that rape is bad. That's just, you know, a thing everyone should know off the bat.
Tweet may have been deleted
Ah, this ol' classic.
To paraphrase the logic behind what's being said by Geraldo Rivera—a walking mouthbreather whose trademark mustache screams "compensating" (also, "FREE ME!")—it seems he's thinking: "Sure, Weinstein's gross. But now that his decades-long reign of sexual terror without consequence is no longer an industry secret, anywoman can go around crying rape and actually (dear god) be believed. The real victims here are clearlycreepy dudes who now have to be held accountable for being creeps toward women!"
It's hard not to read anything like this as, well, preemptive, and said in the interest of covering one's own ass. Because, like Affleck, Geraldo doesn't need to go too far to find other white men in power who were proven to display the same behavior, andget away with it. Take, for example, his Fox buddies Bill O'Reilly and Roger Ailes.
Tellingly, this response is most commonly spouted out of the shit-spewing mouths of men with their own iffy sexual histories. Certified creep and director Oliver Stone took a break from peaking in the '80s to get higher up on his horse about how, "a man shouldn't be condemned by a vigilante system."
SEE ALSO:Now director Oliver Stone has also been accused of sexual misconductMeanwhile, accused child molester Woody Allen -- whose alleged abuse of his own daughter Dylan Farrow lead a judge to decree his behavior so "grossly inappropriate" that"measures must be taken to protect her” -- is also, for some curious reason, sweating about the potential for a "witch hunt atmosphere."
Presumably unaware that the term "witch hunt" originates from a time when women were violently murdered for the crime of being women, the irony of Allen's comments didn't stop there. Woody imagined a dystopian future, "Where every guy in an office who winks at a woman is suddenly having to call a lawyer to defend himself."
Because that would be the real tragedy, right? If we lived in a world where we ended the pervasive sexual harassment of women, at the expense of men not being free to leer at the women they work with.
It's an injustice that the innocent women burned and hanged in Salem couldn't have ever imagined, Woody.
DKNY fashion designer Donna Karan seems hellbent on knowing what Harvey Weinstein's victims did to deserve their abuse:
I think we have to look at ourselves.. how do we display ourselves? How do we present ourselves as women? What are we asking? Are we asking for it by presenting all the sensuality and all the sexuality? And what are we throwing out to our children today about how to dance and how to perform and what to wear? How much should they show?
Hearing the same tired old excuses from men is upsetting, but expected. But hearing a fashiondesigner tout the "But what was she wearing?" line of reasoning is more than a little devastating. Did someone tell her that she actually has a direct influence on how women "present all the sensuality and all the sexuality" through the clothes she designs?
But apparently, some still think questions like "How do we present ourselves as women?" are a more relevant line of investigation in a sexual assault case than, say, "Why are we teaching men that it's OK to rape people?"
Oh, and to answer Donna's question, of "how much should [women] show?" Start with common human decency, for a start. And enough of it to not spout utterly tone-deaf, regressive noise like that.
Credit: twitterDepressingly, it appears female celebrities have taken up the mantle of knee-jerk victim-blaming.
In a Tweet she quickly deleted and replaced with the digital equivalent of tucking your tail between your legs, Vanessa Carlton voiced another common response: Every time a powerful man finally gets taken down for sexual abuse, people quickly turn their ire from the perpetrator to the victims.
Here, Carlton takes this to Inceptionlevels of layered ass-backwardness, by guilting Paltrow, for not coming forward sooner, because she has a daughter.
Hard to understand why Paltrow didn't come forward sooner, right? But it might be because she didn't want to ruin her life, and be silenced or shunned out of her industry (to say nothing of dealing with all the angry baglady takes like Vanessa Carlton's).
Tweet may have been deleted
Honestly, everything that's come out of Lindsay Lohan's mouth since she suddenly decided she has a foreign accent should be struck from the human record. But her choice to put an angel emoji next to the word "Harvey" in this Instagram defense of his character basically sums up another tendency in the wake of an onslaught of sexual allegations.
Granted, the sheer batshitedness of making excuses for sexual predators is not a Lyndsey Lohan problem, though. Regardless of overwhelming evidence, people often appear much more capable of empathizing and believing in the perpetrators of assault than the victims.
We get it. It's not fun to have to face the hard truth that we live in a world where full-on monsters walk in plain sight among us. It's hard to reckon with the fact that someone you worked with closely is one of them. But often, this leads to the gut instinct of disregarding or justifying abuse.
SEE ALSO:People often defend an alleged rapist's character. Here's why you should doubt themWe need to be better about that—and for women like Lindsay, that means not using your own personal experiences as grounds to outright dismiss the experiences of countless other women.
On the other hand, men who find themselves on this side of the shitty take should look deep within themselves to ask why it is they find it so much easierto empathize with an accused sexual assailant than with their dozens of victims.
As detailed above, Woody Allen can't stop lamenting the sad, sad story of Harvey Weinstein ruining his own life by sexually assaulting women for decades with near impunity. Director and writer Oliver Stone shed his male tears for Harvey, saying it's "not easy what he's going through, either.... I've heard horror stories on everyone in the business, so I'm not going to comment on gossip."
Pro tip: don't equate dozens of sexual assault and rape allegations as "gossip." But what can you expect from a man like Stone, who's name keeps cropping up as the next Hollywood sexual abuser waiting to be exposed.
Yeah: it sure is easy to feel bad for the guy who abuses power to sexually harass women, when you're a guy who uses power to sexually harass women.
Credit: facebookYou know what's worse than having your body violated through forced sexual acts? Your shitty 2013 thriller The Canyonsgetting ruined by said sexual predator. And you thought being raped was bad!
This abysmally, almost impressively bad response from writer-director Paul Schrader encapsulates The Male Problem in Hollywood, which is: While women are fighting tooth-and-nail to be heard and equal to men, let alone retain the right to their own bodies, schmucks like Schrader find an instance of losing creative control as "more offensive" than an actual crime against an actual woman. And on the off chance he was being cute, and making a joke? Well, his sense of humor certainly does well to explain the last 37 years of his post-Raging Bulltrack record, which is to say, it sucks ass.
Credit: the new york timesWithout a doubt, Weinstein takes the gold for the OG of shitty responses to the Weinstein scandal. But it's worth understanding exactly what his artfully awful response makes clear about Hollywood's cultural problem. Because, sure, these tactics didn't save Weinstein from the onslaught of evidence this time around. But it's certainly worked for others. And last time, not only did the public buy it, but they voted him into office as the 45th President of the United States.
Using "boys club" behavior as an excuse for being a predator is the definition of missing the point. Instead of equivocating sexual assault with "locker room talk," you might as well say: "I did it because I thought no one was watching, and would never have to face consequences for it, because it was normalized."
Harvey goes one step further, though: At first, he vows to call in attorney Lisa Bloom to "tutor" him on, you know, how to notsexually assault women. Unfortunately, though, no amount of Female Tutoring can cure you of being a purebred scumbag, to say nothing of making right all of the scumbag things you've done.
And of course, given that Harvey has such a hard time understanding that women don't exist just to serve him, he probably doesn't understand that it's also not a woman's job to teach you that rape is bad.
Now, Harvey's trying to scuttle his own shitty reactions to his own shitty behavior by hiding out in Europe, so he can blame his shitty predatory behavior on being, yes, a "sex addict."
This excuse isn't just tired (ask Anthony Weiner) but also offensive to people who actually suffer from sex addiction. It also ignores the fact that the problem wasn't that Weinstein had a lot of sex, but that he forced sex on women who didn't want it.
As his bafflingly botched bait-and-switch with the NRA went, this too just goes to show the sheer lack of effort that went into Weinstein's original apology. It's almost as if no one's ever held him accountable for this kind of behavior.
Oh, wait: That's exactly what happened.
Because only someone with no idea why what he did was wrong would end his apology with a laundry list of the things he's done for women—things that they should feel grateful to him for. If you ever needed an object lesson in what "performative allyship" looks like, then look no further.
As a last-ditch effort to try and convince people that he's a human, instead of the life-sized rotting sphincter of a man that he is, Harvey even parroted the logic that many of the men above used: He is a family man, after all. A father!And he even has a mom!
Because, as we all know, no man who's ever been a father or born to a woman has ever raped anyone, ever. Not once.
Do better. All of you.
TopicsActivism
相关文章：
相关推荐：